Home » Posts tagged 'inflation' (Page 7)
Tag Archives: inflation
Construction Inflation Cost Index
Note: The post you’ve reached here was originally written in Jan 2016. For the latest information follow this link to the newest data on Inflation. 8-15-19
ESCALATION / INFLATION INDICES
Thank You. edz
Jan. 31, 2016
Construction inflation for buildings in 2016-2017 is quite likely to advance stronger and more rapidly than some estimators and owners have planned.
Long term construction cost inflation is normally about double consumer price inflation. Construction inflation in rapid growth years is much higher than average long-term inflation. Since 1993, long-term annual construction inflation for buildings has been 3.5%/yr., even when including the recessionary period 2007-2011. During rapid growth periods, inflation averages more than 8%/yr.
For the period 2013-2014-2015, nonresidential buildings cost indices averaged just over 4%/yr. and residential buildings cost indices average just over 6%/yr. I recommend those rates as a minimum for 2016-2017. Some locations may reach 6% to 8% inflation for nonresidential buildings but new work in other areas will remain soft holding down the overall average inflation. Budgeting should use a rate that considers how active work is in your area.
Infrastructure projects cost indices on average have declined 4% in the last three years. However, infrastructure indices are so unique that individual specific indices should be used to adjust cost of work. The FWHA highway index dropped 4% in 2013-2014 but increased 4% in 2015. The IHS power plant cost index gained 12% from 2011-2014 but then plummeted in 2015 to an eight year low. The PPI industrial structures index and the PPI other nonresidential structures index both have been relatively flat or declining for the last three years.
These infrastructure sector indices provide a good example for why a composite all-construction cost index should not be used to adjust costs of buildings. Both residential and infrastructure project indices often do not follow the same pattern as cost of nonresidential buildings.
Anticipate construction inflation of buildings during the next two years closer to the high end rapid growth rate rather than the long term average.
What Did He Say? Fact Checker – Track Record
MY TRACK RECORD
Indoor Masters National Track Championships
masters age group 45-50
Mile – 4:41.7 – 4th place
3000m – 9:25.3 – 3rd place
Oh, wait. That’s not what you are here to read. You want my track record on construction economic forecasts. How good are my forecasts? Do they prove to be accurate? How do they compare to the rest of the industry forecasts? OK. Let’s have a look.
- Bullets show what I forecast.
This is what actually occurred. Actual is in red if I got it wrong.
From Jan 2013
- The ABI, McGraw Hill Dodge new starts and the Dodge Momentum Index (DMI) are all indicating a dip in nonresidential spending potentially from February through May 2013.
- Architecture Billings Index (ABI) went UP from May 2012 to January 2013 with only December down slightly (see figure B). This is a very good leading indicator for new construction work starting in Q3-Q4 2013.
- I expect a dip in nonresidential buildings work between January and May 2013, at which point all indicators point to sustained growth through year end.
From February 2013 through June 2013 actual spending on nonresidential buildings dropped by 2%. Then from June through November spending increased by 6%.
From Jan 2013
- As spending continues to increase, contractors gain more ability to pass along costs and increase margins. However, contractors almost always are playing catch-up. In the most recent three-month period, contractors’ costs began to climb faster than whole building costs went up, due to both increasing material costs and declining productivity.
- Once growth in nonresidential picks up and both residential and nonresidential are active, we will begin to see apparent labor shortages and productivity losses.
For 2013 and 2014 construction spending increased 7% and 10%. During that 2 year period, total labor and materials inputs increased only 2% to 3%, but construction inflation measured 4.5%. Margins increases drove up the total inflation cost. Available (nonworking) workforce declined to about 400,000, near the lowest on record. Productivity declined by 2%.
From Jan 2013
- Construction Spending for 2013 will be pushed higher by huge growth in residential construction, a rate of spending growth that increased by 30% from Q1 to Q4 2012
Residential spending in 2013 grew at a rate of 1.5% per month, largest one year growth since 2004.
From Jan 2013
- The National Association of Home Builders consensus estimate for new residential units is growth of 23% in 2013 and 33% in 2014. 2012 grew by 28%.
- The NAHB projections are for an increase of 150,000 units in 2013 and 230,000 in 2014, 20% and 27% growth the next two years. There’s a possibility we could achieve that. But, especially in 2014, that would exceed the fastest growth rates, both volume and total jobs, achieved in the last 30 years.
- Mark Zandi, economist for Moody’s, in the same article is quoted as saying his more optimistic forecast has residential construction growing to 1.1mil in 2013 and 1.7mil new housing starts in 2014, growth of 46% and then 54%. I say NO WAY
- A more reasonable projection is new housing starts may reach 850K to 900K in 2013 and 1.0 to 1.05 million in 2014, new homes growth rates of 15% to 20% and total residential spending growth of 12% to 15%. That still has the workforce expanding rapidly, but at least at a not unheard of rate.
Housing starts reached 925,000 in 2013 and 1,003,000 in 2014, well below the 30 year historical annual growth.
From Jan 2013
- Future escalation, in order to capture increasing margins, will be higher than normal labor/material cost growth. Lagging regions will take longer to experience high escalation.
- I’m advising a range of 4% to 6% for 2013, 5% to 7% for 2014 and 6% to 8% for 2015.
- Expect residential escalation near the upper end of the range.
Actual total construction cost inflation 2013 = 4.3%, 2014 = 4.7% 2015 = 2.9%. All inflation values were held to lower totals due to infrastructure work which did not have more than 2% inflation during that period and actually experienced deflation in 2015. Residential buildings inflation for 2013-14-15 was 8.9%, 7.1% and 4.1%.
Posted April 2014
- Construction Spending “residential buildings” expect $379 billion in 2014
- Construction Spending “nonresidential buildings” expect $325 billion in 2014
- Construction Spending “totals” expect $960 billion in 2014
Posted August 2014
- Construction Spending “residential buildings” expect $365 billion in 2014
- Construction Spending “nonresidential buildings” expect $314 billion in 2014
- Construction Spending “totals” expect $961 billion in 2014
2014 Residential spending = $354 billion
2014 Nonresidential spending = $320 billion
2014 Total Construction spending = $960 billion
These values prior to U.S. Census major correction to data.
Posted August 2014
- If you are pricing future construction jobs the way you always have, with 2-3 pct escalation, you are already in trouble!
- If you’re an owner with plans to construct a building in the future and you are inflating cost by only 2-3 pct, you’ve missed the boat.
Total construction inflation for 2013-14-15 was 4.3%, 4.7% and 2.9%. All years were reduced by a lack of inflation in infrastructure work. Inflation for nonresidential buildings was 3.5%, 4.2% and 4.8%. Residential buildings inflation was 8.9%, 7.1% and 4.1%.
Posted September 2014
- Real Construction Volume in 2014 (construction spending minus inflation) will grow less than 2 percent
Real construction volume in 2014 increased 4.9%. Commercial nonresidential construction started it’s current boom.
Posted Dec 2014
- Construction Spending “residential buildings” expect $405 billion in 2015
- Construction Spending “nonresidential buildings” expect $364 billion in 2015
- Construction Spending “totals” expect $1,040 billion in 2015
Posted Jan 2015
- Cash flow of new starts for nonresidential buildings indicates a 15% increase in the monthly rate of spending over the next 10 months.
- Both ABI and Starts cash flows indicate a mild slowdown in nonresidential buildings construction spending at the end of 2014 before a strong upturn in spending in 2015. Expect another drop in spending late in 2015
For the period Nov 2014 through Feb 2015, spending on nonresidential buildings stalled flat for 4 months. The monthly rate of spending increased 14% over the 10 months from Oct 2014 to September 2015. Since Sept 2015 spending has been flat.
Posted March 2015
- Even if new starts turn flat for rest of 2015, starts already recorded are indicating Nonresidential buildings construction spending for 2015 will reach 15%+ growth. My closest competitor is forecasting 12.5% growth. The average of all other industry forecasts is 8% growth.
Spending for nonresidential buildings actually hit +17% growth over 2014.
Posted July 2015
- Construction Spending “residential buildings” expect $388 billion in 2015
- Construction Spending “nonresidential buildings” expect $397 billion in 2015
- Construction Spending “totals” expect $1,067 billion in 2015
2015 Residential spending = $390 billion
2015 Nonresidential spending = $387 billion
2015 Total Construction spending = $1068 billion
These values prior to U.S. Census major correction to data.
Posted July 2015
- Nonresidential Buildings spending growth 2015 vs 2014.
- My forecast (Average all others) [closest competitor]
- Educational 7.1% (3.8%) [5.6%]
- Healthcare 6.0% (3.9%) [4.0%]
- Commercial/Retail 5.5% (11.8%) [8.4%]
- Lodging 24.0% (13.7%) [17.1%]
- Office 21.1% (13.5%) [19.2%]
- Manufacturing 49.6% (15.9%) [24.6%]
Educational 6.7%
Healthcare 4.6%
Commercial/Retail 8.4%
Lodging 30.8%
Office 21.9%
Manufacturing 47.3%
So there you have it. Several years of forecasts and how they turned out. You can get an idea of my track record. You be the judge. 🙂
Construction Spending Nonres Bldgs on a Roll > What it Means for Inflation
This is clearly going to measure up as the breakout year for spending on nonresidential buildings. Growth year-to-date (YTD) is up 18.3%. We will finish the year with total growth up 17%. The last time we saw growth like this was 2007. In fact, 2007 is the only time % growth (and $ volume growth) was ever larger than this year.
Since last December I have been predicting a range from 14% to 20% growth in 2015 nonresidential buildings spending. It looks like we will finish the year right in the middle of that range.
By far the largest $ contribution comes from the growth in manufacturing buildings, up 50% and up $23bil YTD. Next closest is office buildings, up 22% and up $8.3bil YTD. Lodging, Commercial-Retail, Educational and Amusement-Recreation are each up approximately $4bil YTD, quite impressive for Lodging and Amusement-Rec since they both total only $17bil YTD.
Nonresidential buildings spending will maintain greater than 10% growth in 2016 something achieved only 5 times in 25 years. Next year, educational and healthcare buildings will both contribute strongly to the total annual growth. Manufacturing, Office and Lodging will all settle back but still maintain 10% or greater growth. Commercial-retail, which had 3 years of substantial growth from 2012 to 2014 adding nearly 50% spending growth during that time, will grow only 2-3% next year.
With last year, this year and next, nonresidential buildings spending will reach growth of 40% in three years, a growth rate exceeded only once in history, during the last construction boom from 2006 to 2008. Along with that boom in spending came the highest construction inflation ever recorded, an average inflation over 8% per year for 4 years. I expect we are headed there again.
revised / updated table 12-9-15 to include ABC & BMarkstein forecasts.
Construction Spending – What You Need to Know About YTD Mo/Mo Yr/Yr
Common comparisons published in news reports for construction spending are, from best to worst:
- Current year-to-date vs same period previous year. YTD
- Current month vs previous month. Mo/Mo or MOM
- Current month vs same month last year. Yr/Yr or YOY
- Number of months to current value since last time that value achieved.
In some cases a comparison uses Not Seasonally Adjusted (NSA) dollars and in other cases Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate (SAAR) dollars. NSA dollars is the actual amount spent within the month. SAAR dollars represents the annual rate that monthly amount would generate based on the normal proportion typical spent within that month. Typical spending is always much higher in summer months than winter to produce the same SAAR.
Year-to-date is the best comparison. It increases in strength as more months are added to the YTD. It is a value that gives a strong indication of growth over the previous year. Comparisons must be made using Not Seasonally Adjusted (NSA) dollars. Although it does lack adjustment for inflation, only one year of inflation is involved. Not adjusting for inflation is explained as the difference between current dollars and constant dollars.
Current month to month (MOM) comparisons are not generally affected by inflation but may not give a clear indication of movement due to monthly fluctuations. Comparisons absolutely must be made using Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate (SAAR) dollars. It is a gross error to make month to month comparisons using NSA dollars, since there is a normal spending curve that shows the percent of total annual spending can vary considerably from month to month, sometimes by as much as 10%. This variation is accounted for in the SAAR.
When comparing to the same month last year (YOY), the question arises, “Is any big change in YOY caused by the current month performance or by the performance in the same month last year?” Again, YOY is missing adjustment for one year of inflation. Comparison can be NSA or SAAR dollars.
Number of months/years since current value was last achieved is almost always presented as a current dollar comparison. When dealing with cost, because of the long duration often involved it would be much better if it were a constant dollar comparison to account for construction inflation. However, construction inflation may not be readily available and this type of comparison is rarely if ever published using constant dollar comparisons. Comparison should use either entire year total dollars or should use SAAR dollars.
Current dollars = dollars are reported in the value of the year reported 2008=2008$, 2015 = 2015$. 99% of news reports use current dollars and therefore do not account for the influence of inflation.
Constant dollars = all dollars adjusted to represent dollars in the year of comparison. Adjusts for inflation so 2008$ in this case are converted to equivalent 2015$.
It’s not to hard to understand why we need to use constant dollars when you think of it in terms of buying products like food or heating oil. Today heating oil costs $1.90/gallon. In 2008 heating oil cost $3.50/gallon. So, with respect to oil, $350 in 2008 dollars is no different than $190 in 2015 dollars.
In addition to the Year-to-date growth values, here’s two more less common stats for looking at the same information.
Percent change from the last cycle high current$ (contant 2015$)
- Residential – Q1 2006 $390b vs $$680b -43% (-50%)
- Nonresidential Buildings – Q1 2008 $392b vs $$439b -11% (-22%)
- Nonbuilding Infrastructure – Q1 2008 $298b vs $$286b +4% (-10%)
Percent change from the recent recession low current$ (contant 2015$)
- Residential – Q1 2011 $390b vs $$239b +64% (+48%)
- Nonresidential Buildings – Q1 2011 $392b vs $$267b +49% (+35%)
- Nonbuilding Infrastructure – Q1 2008 $298b vs $$243b +22% (+13%)
Constant dollars makes a huge difference in the statistics. Just take a look at Nonresidential buildings. Current dollars would indicate we are now only 11% below the previous high and we’ve had growth of 49% from the recession low. Constant dollars adjusting for inflation shows we are still 22% below the previous cycle high and we’ve had growth of only 35% since the recession lows.
You can find a complete section providing constant dollar cost comparison in my quarterly report. Access the report through the Featured Economic Report tab at the top of this blog
Construction Inflation
LINK to most recent articles on inflation 2019
11-17-2015
( Also See 1-31-2016 comments and chart on inflation )
Over the last 24 months work volume has increased and short-term construction inflation has increased to more than double consumer inflation. It appears construction inflation is already advancing faster than and well ahead of consumer inflation, which supports that consumer inflation is not an indication of movements or magnitude of construction inflation.
It is always important to carry the proper value for cost inflation. Whether adjusting the cost of a recently built project to predict what it might cost to build a similar project in the near future or answering a client question “What will it cost if I delay my project start by one year?”, whether you carry the proper value for inflation (which can differ every year) can make or break your estimate.
- Long term construction cost inflation is normally about double consumer price inflation (CPI).
- Since 1993 but taking out 2 years of recession (-8%), the 20-year average inflation is 4.2%.
- Average long term (30 years) construction cost inflation is 3.5% even with any/all recession years included.
- In times of rapid construction spending growth, construction inflation averages about 8%.
- Although inflation is affected by labor and material costs, a large part of the change in inflation is due to change in contractors/suppliers margins.
- When construction volume increases rapidly, margins increase rapidly.
- Construction inflation can be very different from one major sector to the other and can vary from one market to another. It can even vary considerably from one material to another.
In the 5 years of rapid growth in spending for nonresidential buildings from 2004 through 2008, nonresidential buildings cost inflation totaled 39%, or averaged ~8% per year.
In the 6 years of spending during the residential construction boom from 2000 through 2005, residential building cost inflation totaled 47%, or averaged ~8% per year.
Neither the producer price index (PPI) for construction inputs nor the CPI are good indicators of total construction cost inflation.
Some construction cost indices include only the cost changes for a market basket of labor and materials and do not include any change for margins. Those indices are not a complete analysis of construction cost inflation.
Construction cost inflation must include all changes related to labor wages, productivity, materials cost, materials availability, equipment and finally contractors margins. Margins are affected by the volume growth of new work and demand for new buildings. So be sure to verify what is included in any cost index you reference for real construction cost inflation.
For the last three years residential construction inflation has averaged 5.7% and nonresidential buildings inflation has averaged 4.2%. Nonresidential buildings cost inflation has increased for five consecutive years. Both are likely to increase next year since anticipated volume in both sectors will grow next year.
In my construction spending data set, which goes back to 1993, there were six years with greater than 9% spending growth. By far the largest spending growth years were 2004 and 2005, 11.2% and 11.5%. We are about to repeat that historic level of spending growth. I am predicting 2015 will finish with growth of 11.6% and 2016 will experience 11% growth.
(8-12-16) 2015 finished at 10.6% because 2014 was revised up. Construction spending for 2016 will probably finish closer to 8%.
I expect historic levels of growth in spending will be accompanied by inflation relative to historic high growth periods. Don’t expect long term average inflation in high growth periods. Don’t be caught short in your construction cost budgets!
Graphic updated 1-8-16
The chart shows the low and high range of various independent nonresidential buildings construction actual cost indices. In 2015, the range of estimates was from 2% to 5%. The actual inflation came in at 4%. The plotted line is my result of where inflation actually ended up. A chart for residential construction would show much different values.
( Also See 1-31-2016 comments and chart on inflation )
Construction Analytics 