Construction Data FEB Briefs 4-3-24

Updates to Forecast, spending, starts, inflation, jobs

SEE ALSO Construction Analytics Outlook 2024

2024 construction spending will be measured to the avg of 2023, $1980 bil. The average Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate (SAAR) for 2023 is the total spending for 2023. By Dec the SAAR was already 6% higher than the average for 2023. So we begin 2024 with Dec spending at a SAAR 6% above avg 2023.

As of Feb, the SAAR is 8.3% above 2023. Rsdn +6.1%, Nonres Bldgs +9.5%, Nonbldg +10.8%. If growth stalls here for the year, if we were to end the year with the SAAR unchanged from today, then we would finish with these gains for 2024. The trend in most cases is up, so I expect end of year we will be higher than today..

2024 construction spending, as of FEB, measured to the 2023 avg for Nonres Bldgs, is now +9.5% and trending up. The American Institute of Architects (AIA) Consensus for Nonres Bldgs averages +4%. Only one of the 10 forecasts for Nonres Bldgs spending in the AIA 2024 Consensus is still above the current reading.

The trend in Nonres Bldgs construction spending is up 17 of the last 18 months and continues up 9 of the 10 remaining months in 2024. To come close to most of the forecasts in the AIA, Nonres Bldgs spending for next 10 months of 2024 would need to decline drastically. To fall to the AIA Consensus average of +4% from the current SAAR, up +9.5%, all of the remaining 10 months of 2024 would need to fall from +9.5% to only +3% higher than 2023. Unless something sets off a recession, that will not happen.

Since 2019, spending is up 42%. But after inflation Volume is up only 5%. Almost 90% of the spending growth since 2019 is inflation.

Construction Backlog, the amount of work under contract that is yet to be put-in-place, increased 9% to begin 2024. Nonres Bldgs and Nonbldg both increased over 11%. Although spending is at an all-time high, backlog increases if new starts exceed spending for the year. That could happen if spending decreased, but that is not the case here. It shouldn’t come as a surprise, but manufacturing construction backlog to begin 2024 is up 21%. Highway is up 15%. Environ Pub Works is up 14%.

Don’t try to correlate this to the Associated Builders and Contractors (ABC) Backlog Indicator. That does not measure the same thing. ABC BI measures current backlog as a percent of previous fiscal year revenues, then multiplies that x12 to get what they refer to as the current remaining backlog months of support. Of course, that doesn’t take into account that some backlog gets spent over long duration projects that may go yet for several years. I measure the backlog at the start of this year compared to the backlog at the start of last year.

An avg spending curve for long-duration Non-bldg Infra is 15:30:30:20:5. The greatest spending impact does not show up until year two and three. Example: If 2024 posts $100bil in new starts for Infrastructure, only $15bil of that gets put-in-place in 2024. $30bil would get put-in-place in 2025 and 2026.

Manufacturing construction spending increased 80% in the last 18 months. After inflation volume increased 70%. Mnfg is 30% of all Nonres Bldgs spending, but generated 60% of the increase in Nonres Bldgs spending over the last 18 months.

In my forecast, every major sector ticks up each of next 3mo. All markets tick up each of Feb-Mar-Apr, except for Commercial/Retail. Warehouse starts, which comprise 60% of Comm/Rtl, fell 20% in 2023 and are forecast down 10%+ in 2024.

Looking at the Office Bldgs plot, keep in mind, the Office Bldg market includes Data Centers, where spending has increased.

In the past 18 months, Nonresidential Buildings construction spending increased 37%. Nonres Bldgs JOBS increased only 7%. Normally, this would be explained by inflation, but in this case after adjusting for inflation volume still increased 28%. 18 months, +28% volume, +7% jobs.

Jobs and volume of work should be moving together, evenly. The construction industry has been saying jobs shortages, and yet over an 18mo period, the nonresidential bldgs sector added 20% more volume of work than added jobs. Seems to me that would indicate that volume was absorbed by existing jobs.

In 2023 Nonresidential Building construction jobs increased 3.6%. In that same time Nonres Bldgs spending increased 24%. After inflation volume of business increased 17%. I wouldn’t be surprised if construction job openings remain elevated all through 2024.

Since 2016, construction spending has increased 63%, but after inflation, business volume increased only 1%/yr. From 2016 to 2023, jobs increased 2.5%/yr. Volume and jobs should be moving together.

In 2024, construction volume may increase 7%.

Construction Jobs increased every month since last Mar. In fact, there’s been only 2 down months in last 2 yrs. But in both Dec and Jan, avg hrs worked fell more than jobs added, so total hrs worked declined. Overall avg hrs worked for 2023 is up 4%. Volume is increasing.

Construction Analytics Outlook 2024

Construction Analytics Economic Outlook 2024 includes Construction Data – DEC 2023 Data 2-7-24

2-22-24 At the bottom of this article is a downloadable PDF of the complete 2024 Outlook

Here is a summary of construction spending through December 2023, Inflation through 4th qtr. or Nov where available, and resulting constant dollar volume. 2023 spending will be revised three times in 2024, Mar1, Apr1 and Jul1, and then again on Jul1 2025. Historically, almost all revisions are up.

Construction spending preliminary total for 2023 is up 7.0%. But nearly 80% of that total is inflation. Except for Nonresidential Bldgs, spending increased 23%, so inflation is only 25% of that. Even deducting inflation still leaves 75% of spending as volume growth Most of that growth is in Manufacturing buildings.

Spending is up a total of 42% since 2019; up 8% in 2020, 10% in 2021, 12% in 2022 and now 7% in 2023. But volume after adjusting for inflation is up only 5% total. You can see the Constant$ line, with one lower dip in 2022, has ranged between Constant$1400bil. to $1500bil. since mid-2019.

Construction spending total forecast for 2024 is up 10.7%. Nonresidential Buildings is forecast up 8.8%, Non-building Infrastructure up 15.8% and Residential up 9.7%. Lower inflation in 2024 means more of that spending is counting towards real volume growth. I’m expecting only 4% to 5% inflation for 2024, so real volume growth could reach 6% for the first time since 2015. From 2012-2016, volume growth averaged 6%/yr. For the last four years, 2020-2023, 42% spending growth vs 37% inflation growth netted only 5% total real volume growth. Since 2017, volume growth averaged less than 1%/yr. Non-building Infrastructure volume could increase 10%+ in 2024.

New Construction Starts

Dodge Construction Network (DNC) monthly news article of construction starts by sector provides the data from which the following is summarized.

Total construction starts for 2023 ended down 4%, but Nonresidential Buildings starts finished down 7% and Non-building Infrastructure starts were UP 16%. Residential starts decreased 12% in 2023.

Total construction starts for 2024 are forecast up 7%. Nonresidential Buildings starts are forecast up 5% and Non-building Infrastructure starts up 8%. Residential starts are forecast up 10% in 2024.

In recent years, Nonres Bldgs new starts averaged $300 billion/year. In the 2nd half of 2022, starts averaged near $500 billion/year. For the 1st half 2023 starts dropped to a rate of $390bil./yr., which is still well above the recent average. Then, for 2nd half 2023, starts came back up to average $430 billion/year, the 2nd highest half year average. A 50% increase in new nonresidential building starts in 2022 has a positive impact on the rate of construction spending in 2023 and 2024. It will continue to add lesser impact into 2025.  Projects starting in 2nd half of 2023 could have midpoint of construction, point of peak spending, in 2024 or into 2nd half of 2025, some real long duration starts even later. So, the major spending impact from starts is sometimes one or two years later.

Residential construction (Dodge) starts posted the five highest months ever, all in the 1st 6 months of 2022. In the second half of 2022, residential starts fell 15%. In Q1 2023, residential starts dropped another 12% below 2nd half 2022, the lowest average since Q1-Q2 2020. Finally in July and August, starts regained some strength coming in 33% higher than the lows in Q1. Residential starts finish 2023 down 12% vs 2022. Forecast is up about 10% in 2024.

Nonresidential Buildings, in 2022 posted the largest ever one-year increase in construction starts, up 50%. Some of these starts will be adding to peak spending well into 2025. Nonres Bldgs starts in the 2nd half 2022, averaged 67% higher than any other 6mo period in history. Starts fell 20% in the 1st half 2023 but still posted the 2nd highest 6mo average ever. After two years of outstanding growth, Nonres Bldgs starts close 2023 down 7%. Although 2023 is down 7%, that’s still by far the 2nd best year ever. The forecast for 2024 is +5%.

Manufacturing starts, the market with the largest movement, gained 120% from 2020 to 2023. Manufacturing projects can have a moderately long average duration because some of these are multi-billion$ projects and can have schedules that are 4 to 5 years.

Educational, Healthcare, Lodging and Public Buildings all had starts of 20% or more the last two years.

Non-building starts for the 6 month period Mar-Aug 2023 posted the best 6 months on record, up 30% from the average of 2022. The 2nd half 2022 was up 50% over 1st half 2022. For 2023, Highway/Bridge and Power have the strongest gains. Total Non-building Starts for 2023 are up 16% and they were up 25% in 2022. These starts will help elevate spending through 2025. Non-building starts for 2024 are forecast up 8%.

Power starts are up 25% the last two years. Highway starts and Environmental Public Works are both up 33% the last two years and up 50% the last three years.

Starts data captures a share of the total market or only a portion of all construction spending, on average about 60% of all construction. The easiest way to understand this is to compare total annual construction starts to total annual spending. National starts in recent years about $800 billion/year, while spending in this period ranges from $1,300 billion/year to $1,500 billion/year. From this simple comparison we can see starts captures a share of about 60% of the total market. The actual share for each market varies from as low as 35% to as high as 70%. Before using starts data to forecast spending, starts here were first adjusted for market share.

Starting Backlog

Starting backlog is the estimate to complete (in this analysis taken at Jan 1) for all projects currently under contract. The last time starting backlog decreased was 2011. If new construction starts in the year are greater than construction spending in the year, then for the following year starting backlog increases. It’s when new starts don’t replenish the amount of spending in the year that backlog declines.

80% of all nonresidential spending in any given year is from backlog and could be supported by projects that started last year or 2 to 4 years ago. Residential spending is far more dependent on new starts than backlog. Only about 30% of residential spending comes from backlog and 70% from new starts.

The table below, Forecast Starting Backlog, is model generated by Construction Analytics. Adjusted starts are spread over time to generate cash flow. A sum of spending each month/year, subtracted from start of year plus new starts provides Backlog.

Construction Backlog leading into 2024, in every sector, is at all-time high, in total up 46% from Jan 2020. For the years 2022 and 2023, backlog is up 11% and 12%.  Reaching new highs in Backlog could mean contractors are comfortable adding some backlog, or it could mean not enough labor, subcontractors or suppliers to support advancing growth so quickly, so growth advances slower and more of the work is retained in backlog for longer, essentially dragging out the timeline, or it could be long term workload, 4yr.-6yr. long projects from new starts, such as Manufacturing, where a very large amount enters backlog and gets spent over 4-6yrs., so, although the monthly drawdowns reduce the amount remaining in backlog, it remains in backlog for a long time.

Residential backlog in 2024 is down 0.5%, but from such a previous high, essentially, starts are riding flat along the top. Starts are up 55% since Jan 2020.

Nonresidential Bldgs starting backlog for 2024 received a boost from all the starts in 2022 and 2023. Backlog is up 12% from 2023 and up 50% from Jan 2020.

Nonbuilding Infrastructure starting backlog is up 12% each of the last two years boosted by strong starts in 2022 and 2023. For 2024, backlog is up 40% from Jan 2020.

Manufacturing backlog increased nearly 300% from 2020-2024, from $117bil going into 2020 to $300bil beginning 2024. No other market has ever been close. Manufacturing was responsible for 60% of all the Nonres Bldgs spending growth in 2023. It was also responsible for 60% of the Backlog growth leading into 2024. Nonres Bldgs has a total 3.6 million jobs and has never increased by more than 150,000 jobs in one year. Manufacturing is 30% of all Nonres Bldgs spending, so assume 30% of Nonres Bldgs jobs. That’s 1.2million jobs supporting just Manufacturing projects. So Backlog of $300bil, at 5000 jobs per billion per year, would need 1,500,000 jobs for a year. With a 1,200,000 jobs share of the workforce, that backlog would provide support for 15 months. Of course, new starts add to support throughout the year, but the calculation of how long backlog would support that market segment is valuable.

Backlog at the beginning of the year or new starts within the year does not give an indication of what direction spending will take within the year. Backlog is increasing if new starts during the year is greater than spending during the year. An increase in backlog could immediately increase the level of monthly spending activity, or it could maintain a level rate of market activity, but spread over a longer duration. In this case, there is some of both in the forecast. It takes several years for all the starts in a year to be completed. Cash flow shows the spending over time.

Current Rate of Spending

The current seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of spending gives an indication of how spending will perform in the following year. As we begin 2024, the current rate of spending (SAAR) for Nonresidential Buildings in Q4’23 is $709bil., already 4.5% higher than the average for 2023 ($677bil). If spending stays at the current level and no additional growth occurs, Nonresidential Bldgs spending will finish 2024 up 4.5%. Spending would need to have more monthly declines than increases to finish the year up less than 4.5%. The current forecast shows a monthly SAAR rate of growth for Nonresidential Bldgs. averaging about 0.5%/mo in 2024, so we have a minimum, but we can expect 2024 total spending to rise considerably higher than the current rate.

Non-building Infrastructure current rate of spending is now 3.7% higher than the average for 2023, however the forecast is indicating steady growth of 1%/mo for all of 2024.

Residential current rate of spending is 2.4% above the 2023 average and is forecast to average an increase of just under 1%/mo for 2024.

2024 Construction Spending Forecast

Starts lead to spending, but that spending is spread out over time. Starts represent a contract award. Spending takes the amount of that contract award and spreads it out by a cash flow curve over the duration of the job. An average spending curve for the sum of nonresidential buildings is 20:50:30 over three years. Only about 20% of new starts gets spent in the year started. 50% gets spent in the next year and 30% in YR3/4. An average spending curve for Non-building Infrastructure is more like 15:30:30:20:5. The effect of new starts does not show up in spending immediately. For example: If 2024 posts an additional $100 billion in new starts for Infrastructure, only about $15 billion of that would get put-in-place in 2024. The cash flow schedule for that $100 bil of new starts would extend out over 3 to 5 years. Most of that $100 bil would get spent in 2025 and 2026.

Total Construction Spending $2,190 billion   +10.7% over 2023.

Nonresidential Buildings         $737 billion       +8.8% over 2023.

Non-building Infrastructure   $493 billion       +15.8% over 2023.

Residential Buildings                $960 billion       +9.7% over 2023.

This forecast does not include a recession.

The largest increases to construction spending in 2023 are Manufacturing +$80bil, Highway +$20bil, Public Utilities (Sewage and Waste, Water Supply and Conservation-Rivers-Dams) +$15bil and Educational +$14bil.

Residential regains the top growth spot in 2024 with a forecast spending increase of +$68bil. Manufacturing is forecast to add +$32bil. Highway gains +$26bil, Power +$24bil and Educational gains +$15bil.

One big question is how did the forecast for Manufacturing increase so much since the beginning of 2023. Since January 2023, the starts forecast for 2023 increased by 35%. How much of that 35% is real growth in starts vs an increase in the capture rate of data gathering is yet to be determined, but has an impact of 2023-2024 spending. Also, starts for future years were increased by 50%. Starts (contract awards) drives up the spending forecast, since spending is a function of the future monthly cash flow (spending) of starts.

As we begin the year, Manufacturing SAAR current rate of spending is already 8% higher than the average for 2023. The current rate of spending is increasing at an average of near 2%/month for the next 6 months, then slows or dips slightly for the remainder of the year, indicating total spending for 2024 will finish well above the current rate of 8%. I’m forecasting 16% growth for the year.

Highway SAAR rate of spending begins the year 6.5% higher than the average for 2023, with the current rate increasing at an average of 1%/month for all of 2024, indicating total spending for 2024 will finish well above the current rate of 6.5%. Starts have increased +15%/yr the last three years. My forecast is for 19% growth in 2024 spending.  

Power SAAR rate of spending begins the year 4% higher than the average for 2023, with the current rate increasing at an average over 1%/month for 2024, indicating total spending for 2024 will finish much higher. My forecast is for 20% growth in 2024.

Public Utilities SAAR rate of spending begins the year 6% higher than the average for 2023, with the current rate increasing at an average over 1%/month for 2024. Public Works averaged +15%/yr new starts the last three years. My forecast is for 13% spending growth in 2024.

Residential regains the top spot in 2024 with a forecast spending increase of $68bil. Residential SAAR rate of spending in Q4’23 was up 2.5% over 2023, but December was up 5%. So we begin the year 2.5% to 5% higher than the average for 2023. The rate of spending is forecast to increase 1%/month for 6 months, then fall 0.5%/mo for H2 2024. My forecast is for 10% growth in 2024.

Educational SAAR rate of spending begins 2024 7% higher than the average for 2023, and the current rate is increasing at an average of 0.7%/month for 2024. My forecast is for 13% growth.

Inflation

Construction Inflation differs from other common types of inflation, i.e., Consumer Price Index. It must be accounted for in order to make reasonable calculations for business volume and past or future costs.

30-year average inflation rate for residential and nonresidential buildings is 3.7%. Excluding deflation in recession years 2008-2010, for nonresidential buildings is 4.2% and for residential is 4.6%.

Deflation is not likely. Only twice in 50 years have we experienced construction cost deflation, the recession years of 2009 and 2010. That was at a time when business volume dropped 33% and jobs fell 30%. During two years of the pandemic recession, volume reached a low down 8% and jobs dropped a total 14%.But we gained back far more jobs than volume. That means it now takes more jobs to put-in-pace volume of work. That increases inflation.

The following Construction Inflation plot (for Nonresidential Buildings only) shows three elements: 1) a solid grey bar reflecting the max and min of the 10 indices I track in my weighted average inflation index, 2) a solid black line indicating the weighted average of those 10 indices, and 3) a dotted red line showing the Engineering News Record Building Cost Index (ENR BCI). Notice the ENR BCI is almost always the lowest, or one of the lowest, indices. ENR BCI, along with R S Means Index, unlike final cost indices, do not include margins or productivity changes and in the case of ENR BCI has very limited materials and labor inputs.

Inflation Range 1993-2023 1-3-24

Final cost indices represent total actual cost to the owner and are generally higher than general indices. Producer Price Index (PPI) INPUTS to construction reflect costs at various stages of material production, generally do not represent final cost of materials to the jobsite and do not include labor, productivity or margins. Even with that, a PPI Inputs index +20% for a material could be only a +5% final cost. PPI Final Demand indices include all costs and do represent actual final cost. The solid black line (above) represents the Construction Analytics Building Cost Index for Nonresidential Bldgs and is a final cost index.

Annual PCT 2015-2025 1-13-24

This short table shows the inflation rate for each year. Useful to compare to last year, but you would need to mathematically do the compounding to move over several years. The plot below shows the cumulative inflation index, or the cumulative compounded effect of inflation for any two points in time.

BCI 2001-2024 1-13-24

Typically, when work volume decreases, the bidding environment gets more competitive. We can always expect some margin decline when there are fewer nonresidential projects to bid on, which typically results in sharper pencils. However, when labor or materials shortages develop or productivity declines, that causes inflation to increase. We can also expect cost increases due to project time extensions or potential overtime to meet a fixed end-date.

Current$ Spending, Inflation, Constant$ Volume

Volume = spending minus inflation. Spending includes inflation. Inflation adds nothing to the volume.

Inflation adjusted volume is spending minus inflation, or to be more accurate, spending divided by (1+inflation). Inflation adds nothing to volume growth. The following table shows spending, inflation and volume (spending without inflation) for each year. Spending is current to the year stated. The values in the constant table are indexed to a constant value year, 2019. This shows business volume year to year, can be a lot different than spending would indicate. When inflation is positive, volume is always less than spending by the amount attributed to inflation.

Lower inflation in 2024 means more of that spending is counting towards real volume growth. Expecting only 4% to 5% inflation for 2024, real volume growth could reach 6% for the first time since 2015. From 2012-2016, volume growth averaged 6%/yr. For the last four years, 2020-2023, 42% spending growth vs 37% inflation growth netted only 5% total real volume growth. Since 2017, volume growth averaged less than 1%/yr. Non-building Infrastructure volume could increase 10%+ in 2024.

Spending during the year is the value of business volume plus the inflation on that volume. When inflation is 12%, volume plus 12% = total spending. Revenue is generally measured by spending put-in-place during the year. Revenue does not measure volume growth. In 2022, Nonresidential buildings inflation was 12%, so business volume was 12% less than spending, or 12% less than revenue. Residential volume was 15% less then spending.

When referencing Constant $ growth, remember the dollars for all years are reported here as 2019$. If the baseline year is changed to this year (divide all indices by this year’s index), the resulting comparison would be all years reported as 2024$. The dollars would all be greater, but the percent change would be the same. In this table, nominal spending is divided by the inflation INDEX for the year. You can also deduct the percent inflation from any individual year of spending to find inflation adjusted $ for that year alone, however that method would not allow comparing the adjusted dollars to any other year. A baseline year is necessary to compare dollars from any year to any other year.

Reference Inflation Data Construction Inflation 2024

Through December 2023, Total Construction Spending is up 40% for the four years 2020-2023, but, during that same period inflation increased 35%. After adjusting for 35% inflation, constant $ volume is up only 5%. So, while the current $ spending plot shows a four-year total increase of 40% in spending, the actual change in business volume is up only 5% and has just in the last few months returned to the pre-pandemic peak in Feb-Mar 2020.

Jobs are supported by growth in construction volume, spending minus inflation. If volume is declining, there is no support to increase jobs. Although total volume for 2023 is up 2.3%, Residential volume is down 9%, Nonresidential Bldgs volume is up 16% and Non-building volume is up 8%. Inflation was so high in 2021 and 2022 that it ate away most of the spending gains in those years. 

Jobs vs Volume

Construction Jobs increased 2.75% in 2023. We added 214,000 jobs (avg’23-avg’22). There are currently 8,056,000 construction jobs. The largest annual increase post 2010 is 321,000 jobs (+4.6%) in 2018. The average jobs growth post 2010 is 200,000 jobs per year.

Since 2010, average jobs growth is 3%/yr. Average volume of work growth since 2010 is 2.3%/yr. This plot shows Jobs and Volume growth closely match from 2011 to 2018. With few exceptions for recession periods, this pattern can be seen throughout the historical data.

Jobs vs Volume Jan2011-Jan2025 2-7-24

What’s remarkable about the growth is this, since 2016, spending has increased 63%, volume after inflation increased 6% and jobs increased 19%. In the last 7 years, 2017-2023, jobs increased 2.5%/yr. Volume of work increased only 0.8%/yr. Volume and jobs should be moving together.

Jobs vs Volume Jan2015-Jan2025 2-7-24

It takes about 5000 jobs to put-in-place $1 billion of volume in one year. It could easily vary from 4000 to 6000. So, an add of $100 billion+ in one year would need 500,000 new jobs. Jobs should track volume, not spending growth. Volume = spending minus inflation.

Normal construction jobs growth is about 250,000 jobs per year and maximum prior growth is about 400,000. From the table above, Nonresidential Bldgs and Non-building Infrastructure added $100bil of volume in 2023 and will add $60bil in 2024.  The workload discussed above would theoretically require 500,000 new jobs in 2023 and 300,000 more in 2024. That’s an expansion of the industry workforce by 10% in two years, for just half the industry, in an industry that normally grows in total 3%/yr. This industry can’t grow that fast. This may have some impact if over-capacity growth results in a potential reduction or extension in future forecast. You can’t increase spending that fast if you can’t also expand the labor force and the suppliers to the industry that fast.

In the last 12 months, Dec’22 to Dec’23, Nonres Bldgs jobs are up 4%. Nonres Bldgs spending is up 23%, by far driven by Manufacturing, but after ~5.4% inflation, volume of nonres bldgs workload is up 16%. So, we have a 4% increase in jobs versus a 16% increase in volume.

Jobs vs Vol CONSTANT NONRES BLDG 2020-2025 2-3-24

The last year has shown a huge increase in the volume of nonres bldgs work, without an equal increase in jobs. Is this excess nonres bldgs jobs for the past three years now absorbing added workload, (a 4% increase in jobs but a 16% increase in volume), without collapsing the labor force or canceling the volume?

Non-building, over the next two years, could experience the same kind of growth spurt as Nonres Bldgs., a forecast increase in volume the next two years without an equal increase in jobs. Volume which was lower than jobs since 2021, is now increasing faster than jobs. Non-bldg volume is forecast up 6% to
8%/year the next 3 years. Jobs increase at an avg. 3.5%/year.

Jobs vs Vol CONSTANT NONBLDG 2020-2025 2-3-24

Residential volume has exceeded residential jobs all the way back to 2011. The recent decline in volume brings the two even, if the jobs hold the pace.

Jobs vs Vol CONSTANT RSDN 2020-2025 2-3-24

For as long as I can remember, the construction industry has been complaining of jobs shortages. And yet, as shown in the data mentioned above, jobs have increased multiples times greater than volume of work. With an exception for recession years, (2007-2010 and 2020), jobs increase at a rate of 2.5% to 3% per year. The greatest disparity between jobs and volume occurred in late 2022, when jobs growth had already resumed normal pace, but volume of work was still reeling from the effects of new construction starts that were canceled dating back to late 2020-early 2021. Recent volume growth at a much faster rate than jobs growth is now closing the gap.

When jobs increase without an equal increase in the volume of work, productivity declines. This recent increase in volume and the projected increase in volume in 2024, several points stronger than jobs, will offset some of the disparity which has been negative for a long time.

 PIP per job 1996-2023 ALL JOBS 2-7-24

Reference Inflation Data Construction Inflation 2024

Reference Article The Next Forecast Challenge

Reference Article Midyear ’23 Jobs Outlook

Reference Article   Reliability of Predicted Forecast  

Reference Link to Web Dodge Construction News

 

Below is a downloadable 24 page PDF of the complete 2024 Outlook

 

 

Construction Inflation 2024

To properly adjust the cost of construction over time you must use an Actual Final Cost Inflation Index, otherwise called a selling price index. General construction cost indices and Input price indices that don’t track whole building final cost do not capture the full cost of escalation in construction projects.

Spending Must Be Adjusted by Inflation

Usually, construction budgets are prepared from known “current” costs. If a budget is being developed for a project whose midpoint of construction costs is two years in the future, you must carry in your budget an appropriate inflation factor to represent the expected cost of the building at that time. Why the midpoint? Because half the project cost occurs prior to that point and half occurs later than that. Actually, the midpoint of spending is 50-60% into the schedule, but the calculation to the midpoint of schedule is close. So, the average inflation for the project includes early contracts that have less inflation than average and also later contracts that would have more than the average inflation. Construction inflation should always be calculated from current cost to midpoint of construction, or in the case of using historical data and converting an older actual cost to a future budget, from midpoint to midpoint.

Any time a construction project is delayed or put on hold to start at some future date, construction cost inflation must be calculated and added to the previous budget to account for the unanticipated cost increase due to the delay. Of utmost importance is using appropriate cost indices and forecasting future cost growth to account for the difference in original budget and revised budget.

Besides the estimator’s need to accurately reflect future expected cost, inflation is an important aspect of the company business plan. Typically discussed in tandem with spending, inflation has an impact on tracking and forecasting company growth. All spending includes inflation, but inflation adds nothing except $ signs to the overall growth. For example, in a year when company revenues (spending) increase by 10%, if inflation is 6%, then total growth is only 4%. To accurately calculate growth, and the need for labor to support that growth, spending must be adjusted by the amount of inflation.

Types of Construction Inflation Indices

General construction cost indices and Input price indices that don’t track whole building final cost do not capture the full cost of inflation on construction projects.

Consumer Price Index (CPI), tracks changes in the prices paid by consumers for a representative basket of goods and services, including food, transportation, medical care, apparel, recreation, housing. The CPI index in not related at all to construction and should not be used to adjust construction pricing.

Producer Price Index (PPI) for Construction Inputs is an example of a commonly referenced construction cost index that does not represent whole building costs. The PPI tracks material cost inputs at the producer level, not prices or bids at the as-built level.

Engineering News Record Building Cost Index (ENRBCI) and RSMeans Cost Index are examples of commonly used indices that DO NOT represent whole building costs yet are widely referenced by construction firms and estimators everywhere to adjust project costs. Neither includes contractor margins.

It should be noted, there are far fewer available resources for residential inflation than for nonresidential inflation.

One of the best predictors of construction inflation is the level of activity in an area. When the activity level is low, contractors are all competing for a smaller amount of work and therefore they may reduce bids. When activity is high, there is a greater opportunity to bid on more work and bids can be higher. The level of activity has a direct impact on inflation.

To properly adjust the total cost of construction over time you must use actual final cost indices, otherwise known as selling price indices.

Selling Price is whole building actual final cost. Selling price indices track the final cost of construction, which includes, in addition to costs of labor and materials and sales/use taxes, general contractor and sub-contractor margins or overhead and profit.

Construction Analytics Building Cost Index, Turner Building Cost Index, Rider Levett Bucknall Cost Index and Mortenson Cost Index are all examples of whole building cost indices that measure final selling price (for nonresidential buildings only).

Residential inflation indices are primarily single-family homes but would also be relevant for low-rise two to three story building types. Hi-rise residential work is more closely related to nonresidential building cost indices.

Producer Price Index (PPI) Final Demand Indices are an example of construction cost indices that represent whole building costs. Final Demand PPI, or Selling Price, represents contractors bid price to client. Includes labor, material, equipment, overhead and profit. Labor includes change in wages and productivity.

Every three months (Jan, Apr, Jul, Oct) BLS performs an update survey to correct the PPI Final Demand indices. For the past six quarterly updates, about 80% to 90% of the change in the index was posted in the update month. Therefore, PPI Final Demand Indices should not be referenced monthly. These are quarterly indices. January is an update month. PPI Final Demand for Jan index is basically the correction for Nov and Dec. The index should NOT be compared mo/mo. Compare qtr/qtr, but make sure to use the correct update month with two other months, (Jan +Dec+Nov)/(Oct+Sep+Aug).

Refer to National Inflation Indices for comparison to several national selling price indices or various Input indices. National reference indices are useful for comparison. Few firms project index values out past the current year, therefore all future projections in these tables are by Construction Analytics.

Construction Inflation History

Post Great Recession, 2011-2020, average inflation rates:

Nonresidential buildings inflation 10-year average (2011-2020) is 3.7%. In 2020 it dropped to 2.5%, but for the six years 2014-2019 it averaged 4.4%. In 2021 it jumped to 8%, the highest since 2006-2007. In 2022 it hit 12%, the highest since 1980-81.

Residential 8-year average inflation for 2013-2020 is 5.0%. In 2020 it was 4.5%. In 2021 it jumped to 14% and then in 2022 reached 15.7%. the highest on record.

30-year average inflation rate (excluding 2021 and 2022) for residential and nonresidential buildings is 3.7%. Excluding deflation in recession years 2008-2010, then for nonresidential buildings it is 4.2% and for residential it’s 4.6%.

  • Long-term construction cost inflation is normally about double consumer price index (CPI).
  • In times of rapid construction spending growth, nonresidential construction annual inflation averages about 8%. Residential has gone as high as 10%.
  • Nonresidential buildings inflation (prior to 2021-2022) averaged 3.7% since the recession bottom in 2011. Six-year 2014-2019 average is 4.4%.
  • Residential buildings inflation (prior to 2021-2022) reached a post-recession high of 8.0% in 2013 but dropped to 3.5% in 2015. It has averaged 5.3% for 8 years 2013-2020.
  • Although inflation is affected by labor and material costs, a large part of the change in inflation is due to change in contractors’ and suppliers’ margins.
  • When construction volume increases rapidly, margins increase rapidly.
  • Deflation is not likely. Only twice in 50 years have we experienced construction cost deflation, the recession years of 2009 and 2010. That was at a time when business volume went down 33% and jobs were down 30%.

Historically, when spending decreases or remains level for the year, inflation rarely (only 10% of the time) climbs above 3%. Avg inflation for all down/flat years is less than 1%. That did hold true in 2020 for both Nonres Bldgs and Non-bldg Infra. It also held true in 2023 for Residential. It did not hold true in 2021 or 2022. In 2021, spending was down for nonresidential buildings and flat for non-building. Inflation for both was over 8%.

Differences in Tracking Period

Be careful when referencing YTD growth. YTD can be the growth so far this year, that is, growth compared to December of the prior year, or it can be YTDcurrentyr/YTDlastyr. Neither represents the growth from the avg of the previous year, which becomes the historical value. Both are useful during the year to judge trends. The average growth for the year accounts for all the peaks and valleys within each year and and is the value carried forward into the index tables and charts.

Also, use caution when referencing Dec/Dec growth. An example of the difference between Dec/Dec tracking or year over year, and annual average tracking, is Steel Mill Products which was down 28.7% Dec22/Dec21, but the annual average for 2022 is still up 9.0% from the average 2021. In fact, the three years 20-21-22 show Dec/Dec combined inflation is +71%, but the annual averages for those same three years shows total inflation growth of 87%. Annual averages should be used to report inflation.

PPI Construction Materials Inputs Indices

Inputs Table updated 4-11-24 Total index for 2023 was flat to down slightly. Currently, Concrete products and Paving 4% to 6% above the average index for 2023, lumber down 2%.

In the quarterly percent change table you can see the drop in Q3’22 and more in Q4’22, a sharp change in the rate of inflation. This shows up as expected in lower average of Inputs to Res and NonRes for 2023.

4-11-24 PPI Materials Inputs to both Residential and Nonres Bldgs UP slightly (1.0% to 1.2%) in Q1 (after both were up most of 2023 but down every month in Q4’23. PPI Final Demand shows several qtrs down. So, recent relief could be decrease in margins.

A General construction cost index or Input price index doesn’t track whole building final cost and does not capture the full cost of inflation in construction. Final cost indices represent total actual cost to the owner and are often higher than General indices. Producer Price Index (PPI) INPUTS to construction reflect costs at various stages of material production, generally do not represent final cost of materials to the jobsite and do not include labor, productivity or margins. PPI Final Demand indices include all costs and do represent actual final cost to the Owner.

PPI Construction Final Demand Indices

PPI Final Demand indices should not be referenced monthly. These are quarterly indices. PPI Final Demand Indices are for Nonresidential Bldgs only. Every three months (Jan, Apr, Jul, Oct) BLS performs an update survey to correct the PPI Final Demand indices for the current month and the previous two months. For the past six quarterly updates, about 80% to 90% of the change in the index was posted in the update month. January data (released in Feb) is an update month. The PPI Final Demand for Jan. is basically the correction for Nov.+Dec.+Jan. The index should NOT be compared mo/mo. Compare qtr/qtr, but make sure to use the correct update month with two other months, (Nov+Dec+Jan)/(Aug+Sep+Oct).

Due to the nature of the PPI Final Demand Index, (2 monthly readings from model then every 3rd month correction by contractor survey), the correction month for the last 3 full periods flipped the sign of the 6 modeled months and turned every month for the last 9 months negative.

2-16-24 The PPI Final Demand table below is updated to Jan, 2024 data, which closes out Q4’23. Most bldg types are down from Nov-Dec-Jan’23 to Nov-Dec-Jan’24, so, if extended, the trend leading into 2024 is for slightly lower inflation. However Roofing and Plumbing trades are increasing.

The Construction PPI Final Demand for Nonres Bldgs posted declines for the last three, and in some cases four, quarters, Q1 thru Q4 2023. When the adjustment is distributed back into the months being corrected, Apr into Feb and Mar, Jul into May and Jun, and Oct into Aug and Sep, it shows all bldgs, except Offc, have at least nine months of a declining rate of inflation cost, and actually for the last 6 months negative inflation or deflation. Office has been negative for 2 quarters, warehouse has been declining for 12 months and negative for 9 months.

Due to the nature of the PPI Final Demand Index, (2 monthly readings from model then every 3rd month correction by contractor survey), the correction month for the last 3 periods has flipped the sign of the 6 modeled months and turned every month for the last 9 months negative.

In 2023, for each quarter, we see two months posted positive, then a large negative value for the correction month. The negative correction is large enough in all cases to turn the entire quarter negative. Here’s an example: for the period May-Jun-Jul, Jul is the correction month. PPI values were +0.09%, +0.02%, -1.23%. The average for each of the 3mo is -0.37%, (the sum of the 3 months divided equally. The May and Jun values that were originally posted based on modeling flipped from + to – after the contractor survey value is applied to the QTR. That highlights why PPI Final Demand indices should not be referenced monthly.

However, these declines are from such a high mark at the end of 2022 (we began 2023 up 11%), that the current rate as we begin 2024 is still up 6% to 7% from the average in 2022.

2-16-24 The PPI Final Demand table of qtr/qtr is updated to Jan, 2024 data

2-16-24 The PPI Final Demand plot is updated to Jan, 2024 data

Construction Analytics Building Cost Indices and Reference Indices

Current and predicted Inflation updated to Q4’23  1-13-24

  • 2022 Rsdn Inflation 15.7%, Nonres Bldgs 12.1%, Nonbldg Infra 17.0%
  • 2023 Rsdn Inflation 2.5%, Nonres Bldgs 5.4%, Nonbldg Infra 4.9%
  • 2024 Rsdn Inflation 3.4%, Nonres Bldgs 4.5%, Nonbldg Infra 3.8%

The following Construction Inflation plot (for Nonresidential Buildings only) shows three elements: 1) a solid grey bar reflecting the max and min of the 10 indices I track in my weighted average inflation index, 2) a solid black line indicating the weighted average of those 10 indices, and 3) a dotted red line showing the Engineering News Record Building Cost Index (ENR BCI). Notice the ENR BCI is almost always the lowest, or one of the lowest, indices. ENR BCI, along with R S Means Index, unlike final cost indices, do not include margins or productivity changes and in the case of ENR BCI has very limited materials and labor inputs.

Most of the tables and plots here are cumulative indexes. Construction Inflation annual percents for the three major sectors, Residential, Nonresidential Bldgs and Non-building Infrastructure, are recorded in this short table, Escalation form Prev Year. Useful to compare to last year, but you would need to mathematically do the compounding to move over several years.

Final cost indices represent total actual cost to the owner and are generally higher than general indices. Producer Price Index (PPI) INPUTS to construction reflect costs at various stages of material production, generally do not represent final cost of materials to the jobsite and do not include labor, productivity or margins. Even with that, a PPI Inputs index +20% for a material could be only a +5% final cost. PPI Final Demand indices include all costs and do represent actual final cost. The solid black line (above) represents the Construction Analytics Building Cost Index for Nonresidential Bldgs and is a final cost index.

All of the Index Tables and the plot below, Construction Analytics Building Cost Index, show the cumulative inflation index, or the cumulative compounded effect of inflation for any two points in time.

How to use an index: Indexes are used to adjust costs over time for the effects of inflation. An index already compounds annual percent to prevent the error of adding annual percents. To move cost from some point in time to some other point in time, divide Index for year you want to move to by Index for year you want to move cost from, TO/FROM. Costs should be moved from/to midpoint of construction, the centroid of project cost. Indices posted here are at middle of year and can be interpolated between to get any other point in time.

The three yellow highlighted lines in the index tables are plotted here. The three major sectors, Residential, Nonresidential Buildings and Non-building Infrastructure,

This table and plot is an extension of the tables and plots above. Data is as of Q4 2023, but the table covers from 1967 to 2000. Data is pretty sparse.

Non-building Infrastructure Indices

In the Index tables above, dividing the current year by the previous year will give the current year’s inflation rate. All indices are the average rate for the year.

Also, in the tables above, all reference indices data is gathered from the original source, then all are normalized to a common base, 2019 = 100. This allows us to see how different indices compare.

Comparison of Indices

This plot compares four final cost indices and three inputs cost indices. Prior to 2020 there is a lot of symmetry in the final cost group. Everything changed after that.

Previous year Construction Inflation 2023 – last updated 12-15-23

Links to Data Sources Construction Inflation >>> Links

Links to Explanations of PPI Index PPI Explanation provided by AGC

Construction Data Briefs – Nov Data 1-3-24

Overall forecast has not changed a lot from the last two months. I’ll add much more to this post in the coming days, but for now here is a summary of construction spending through November, Inflation through 3rd qtr or Nov where available, and resulting constant dollar volume.

This forecast is preliminary to the 2024 Outlook, which will be published in February after Census releases the initial Dec. 2023 spending (on Feb. 2nd) to begin closing out the year 2023, although 2023 spending will be revised three times after the February release. In addition construction starts, jobs data and inflation will be updated, all leading to a more accurate forecast for 2024 spending and inflation adjusted volume.

Total construction spending forecast is up 6.6% in 2023. Spending was up 12% in 2022 and 10% in 2021. Almost all of that is inflation. You can see the Constant$ line, with one lower dip in 2022, has ranged between $1400bil. to $1500bil. since mid-2019.

As we begin 2024, the current rate of spending for Nonresidential Buildings is already 3.5% higher than the average for 2023, so if spending stays at the current level and no additional growth occurs, 2024 Nonres Bldgs spending will finish the year up 3.5%. The current forecast shows a monthly rate of growth slowing to less than 0.5%/mo in 2024. Non-building Infrastructure is currently only 1% higher than the average for 2023, however the forecast is indicating steady grown of 1%/mo for all of 2024.

Residential current rate of spending is 1.5% above the 2023 average and is forecast to average an increase of 0.5%/mo for 2024.

One big question is how did the forecast for Manufacturing increase so much since the beginning of 2023. The starts forecast for 2023 increased by 35% since January. Starts for future years increased by 50%. Starts (contract awards) drives up the spending forecast since spending is a function of the future monthly cash flow (spending) of starts.

The largest increases to construction spending in 2023 are Manufacturing +$80bil, Highway +$18bil and Public Utilities (Sewage and Waste, Water Supply and Conservation-Rivers-Dams) +$15bil.

Residential regains the top spot in 2024 with a forecast spending increase of $68bil. Manufacturing is forecast to add +$33bil. Educational gains +$16bil and Power +$15bil.

Remember when referencing the Constant $ growth that the dollars for all years are reported here in 2019$. In this table, the nominal spending is divided by the inflation INDEX for the year. You can also deduct the percent inflation from any individual year of construction spending to find inflation adjusted $ for that year alone, however that method would not allow comparing the adjusted dollars to any other year. Setting a baseline year is necessary to compare dollars from any year to any other year.

Reference Inflation Data Construction Inflation 2023 updated 1-12-24

Construction JOBS increased 2.75% in 2023. We added 214,000 jobs (avg’23-avg’22). There are currently 8,056,000 construction jobs. The largest increase post 2010 is 321,000 jobs (+4.6%) in 2018. The average jobs growth post 2010 is 200,000 jobs per year.

Since 2010, average jobs growth is 3%/yr. Average volume of work growth since 2010 is 2.3%/yr.

In the last 7 years, 2017-2023, jobs increased 2.5%/yr. Volume of work increased only 0.8%/yr.

The following Construction Inflation plot (for Nonresidential Buildings only) shows three elements: 1) a solid grey bar reflecting the max and min of the 10 indices I track in my weighted average inflation index, 2) a solid black line indicating the weighted average of those 10 indices, and 3) a dotted red line showing the Engineering News Record Building Cost Index (ENR BCI). Notice the ENR BCI is almost always the lowest, or one of the lowest, indices. ENR BCI, along with R S Means Index, unlike final cost indices, do not include margins or productivity changes and in the case of ENR BCI has very limited materials and labor inputs.

Final cost indices represent total actual cost to the owner and are generally much higher. Producer Price Index (PPI) INPUTS to construction reflect costs at various stages of material production, generally do not represent final cost of materials to the jobsite and do not include labor, productivity or margins. PPI Final Demand indices include all costs and do represent actual final cost. The solid black line (above) represents the Construction Analytics Building Cost Index for Nonresidential Bldgs and is a final cost index.

This short table shows the inflation rate for each year. Useful to compare to last year, but you would need to mathematically do the compounding to move over several years. The plot below shows the cumulative inflation index, or the cumulative compounded effect of inflation for any two points in time.

Construction Data Briefs Sept data 11-7-23

Total Construction Spending in 2023 is forecast at $1,960 billion, an increase of 6.0% over 2022.

Nonresidential Buildings spending is leading Construction spending growth.

With nine months in the year-to-date (ytd) for 2023, total all construction spending ytd is up 4.6%. Nonresidential buildings spending is up 22% ytd compared to Jan-Sep 2022. Manufacturing last month was up 72% ytd. I forecast then it would drop to 66% and this month revised that to 67%. Current ytd dropped this month to 70%.

Construction Spending thru Sept. Residential is down 8% ytd. Could add 7% in 2024. Nonresidential Bldgs is up 22% ytd. Expect +6% in 2024 Non-building Infrastr is up 12% ytd and could add another 11% in 2024

Residential construction spending fell only 8% from Mar’20, the pre-recession high, to May’20, the Covid low. From May’20 to May’22, spending increased 67% to the post-recession high. Since May’22 spending is down 12%.

Manufacturing construction spending, from 2015-2021, averaged $80bil/yr. For 2023-2025, manufacturing constr spending will average $200bil/yr.

Highway spending in 2023 is averaging $130bil and is expected to finish the year at $131bil. That’s up 15% from 2022 and up almost 27% in the last two years. Highway spending is expected to increase 25% over the next two years and may continue upward to a peak spending in 2026.

After nearly 8-10 years of fairly well balanced construction volume of work vs jobs, the last 2-4 yrs of volume growth (spending minus inflation) well below jobs, is now coming back into balance. Nonres Bldgs and Non-bldg volume (+11% & +6%) increased to support jobs. Jobs grow steady at 2.8%.

Non-bldg has a ways to go to get to balance. That work volume is on it’s way in the forecast, particularly from Highway and Public Utilities.

Actual residential jobs is probably higher than shown here as there are several issues with capturing all residential jobs.

Sum of all jobs vs Construction volume from 2011-2018 was balanced. In recent years, 2021-2023, jobs grew faster than volume. Nonres is now playing catch-up, volume is increasing faster than jobs..

Construction Jobs x hours worked is up 6% since the pre-pandemic high in Q1 2020. Construction volume (spending minus inflation) is down 5.5% since Q1 2020. These two indicators should move in tandem. (See plot above from Jan2011 to Jan2018) When jobs increase faster than the volume of work, productivity is declining.

For 2024 and 2025, volume of work is forecast to increase 3.5% and 4.0%. Most of that gain in 2024 and 2025 is from Non-building Infrastructure forecast growth of 7% and 8%. Jobs increase at a normal rate of 2.5% to 3.0% per year, so this growth in volume will go a long way towards setting jobs vs volume closer to balance.

An indicator I track looks at the predicted final spending (for Nonresidential buildings) for the year based on a projection based on the ytd for the statistically strongest months of the year, AMJJAS. These six months each average annual spending variation from average with standard deviation of less than 0.2%. This subset of annual data has produced an annual forecast within less than 2% variance from actual for 22 years. In fact, in 22 years this forecasting check has varied from actual by greater than 1.5% only twice. The average variation for 22 years is 0.7%. Only once in 22 years has the actual annual spending fell outside the range predicted by the statistically strongest months.

Another indicator I track is the forecast vs the actual spending. This plot shows Nonres Bldgs and Non-bldg Infra forecast vs actual. The track of actual spending is bumpier, but tracks right along with the forecast. My plot for residential was on track until the surge in 2020-2021.

Construction Data Briefs AUG Data 10-6-2023

Total Construction Spending in 2023 is forecast at $1,950 billion, an increase of 5.5% over 2022.

Nonresidential Buildings spending is leading Construction spending growth. With eight months in the year-to-date (ytd) for 2023, total all construction spending ytd is up 4.2%. Nonresidential buildings spending is up 22% ytd compared to Jan-Aug 2022, the fastest rate of nonres bldgs growth in over 30 years. Only 2006 & 2007 come close at 13% & 19% growth years. Commercial/Retail spending peaked in January 2023 and has dropped every month since. It will drop from a ytd of 8.5% down to a yearly total of 5%. Manufacturing is up 74% ytd and will hold on to finish the year up 66%.

Nonbuilding spending ytd is up 12%. The largest advances are in Highway, up 16% ytd, and Public Utilities. Sewage/Waste Water is up 24% ytd, Water Supply is up 15% ytd and Conservation/Rivers/Dams is up 26% ytd .

Residential Spending ytd compared to Jan-Aug 2022 is still down -8.7%. Residential spending peaked in Mar 2022 and had a recent bottom in Apr 2023. Since April, the annual rate of residential spending is up 5.6%, almost entirely due to an 8% increase in the largest segment, single family spending, 45% of all residential spending. Multifamily spending is is up 6%, but it’s only 15% of residential spending.

Spending Forecast

Total Construction Spending in 2023 is forecast at $1,950 billion, an increase of 5.5% over 2022.

Nonresidential Buildings spending is forecast at $662 billion, an increase of 20.6% over 2022.

Non-building Infrastructure spending is forecast at $421 billion, an increase of 12.9% over 2022.

Residential Buildings spending is forecast at $867 billion, a decline of -6.5% less than 2022.

This forecast does not include a recession.

Spending by Sector Current $ and Inflation Adjusted Constant $

In 2023, it’s Nonresidential Buildings leading growth. In 2024, it will be Non-building Infrastructure leading spending growth. Both are expected to post spending growth greater than the inflation index, so there will be real volume growth. In 2020+2021, residential volume grew 10%/yr. For 2023, residential volume drops 10%. Nonresidential Bldgs will post a 13% increase in volume in 2023 and flatten out at that level through 2024. Non-building volume increases 6% to 7%/yr for the next few years.

New Construction Starts

The rate of construction spending in 2023 will be influenced predominantly by a 50% increase in new nonresidential building starts in 2022. In recent years, new nonres bldgs starts averaged $300 billion/year. In the 2nd half of 2022, starts averaged near $500 billion/year. From Mar-Aug 2023 starts averaged $400 billion/year. Many of those projects will have peak spending in 2023 or 2024.

Residential construction (Dodge) starts posted the five highest months ever, all in the 1st 6 months of 2022. In the second half of 2022, residential starts fell 15%. In Q1 2023, residential starts dropped another 12% below 2nd half 2022. Finally in July and August, starts regained some strength coming in 33% higher than the lows in Q1. Residential starts are still down 17% year-to-date vs 2022.

Nonresidential Buildings, in 2022 posted the largest ever one-year increase in construction starts, up 50%. Nonres Bldgs starts in the 2nd half 2022, averaged 67% higher than any other 6mo period in history. Starts fell 20% in the 1st half 2023 but still posted the 2nd highest 6mo average ever. Nonres Bldgs starts are down 17% ytd.

Growth in Manufacturing construction starts for 2022 far surpasses growth in any other market, up over 150%.

Non-building starts for the 6 month period Mar-Aug 2023 posted the best 6 months on record, up 30% from the average of 2022. The 2nd half 2022 was up 50% over 1st half 2022. The 6 months Mar-Aug 2023 is up 18% from 2nd half 2022. For 2023, Highway/Bridge and Power have the strongest gains. Total Non-building Starts for 2023 are forecast up 25%. Non-bldg starts are up 22% ytd.

Current $ Spending, Inflation and Constant $ Volume

Inflation adjusted volume is spending minus inflation, or to be more accurate, spending divided by (1+inflation). Inflation adds nothing to volume growth. The following table shows spending, inflation and volume (spending without inflation) for each year. Spending is current to the year stated. The values in the constant table are indexed to a constant value year, 2019. This shows business volume year to year, can be a lot different than spending would indicate. When inflation is positive, volume is always less than spending by the amount attributed to inflation.

SEE Construction Inflation 2023

Spending during the year is the value of business volume plus the inflation on that volume. When inflation is 12%, volume plus 12% = total spending. Revenue is generally measured by spending put-in-place during the year. Therefore, Revenue does not measure volume growth. In 2022, Nonresidential buildings inflation was 12%, so business volume was 12% less than spending, or 12% less than revenue. Residential volume was 15% less then spending.

Through August 2023, Overall Construction Spending is up 28% in the 42 months since the onset of the pandemic, but, during that same period inflation increased 33%. After adjusting for 33% inflation, constant $ volume is down 5%. So, while the plot on the left shows three years of increases in spending, the actual change in business volume is still down and has not yet returned to the pre-pandemic peak in Feb-Mar 2020.

Does Volume of Work Support Jobs Growth?

or, Can jobs growth support volume of work?

Jobs should track volume, not spending growth. Volume = spending minus inflation. Volume is down, although now increasing, while jobs are up. Nonres Bldgs volume, in constant $, fell 25% from Feb 2020 to Sept 2021, and hit a second deeper low in mid-2022. Since then, the actual change in nonres bldgs volume has increased 18%. Yet nonres bldgs jobs increased only 3.5%. That still leaves volume nearly 10% lower than the pre-pandemic high. If the same production levels ($ put-in-place per worker) as 2019 were to be regained, theoretically, nonresidential volume would need to increase 10% with no increase in nonresidential jobs. For now, productivity is well below that of 2019, but it is improving because volume is increasing rapidly and jobs are increasing slowly.

Nonresidential Buildings spending in 2023 is forecast at $660 billion, an increase of 20.6%, or an increase of $113 billion in 2023. Non-building Infrastructure spending is forecast up 13% ($50bil) in 2023 and 10% ($40bil) in 2024.

Generally, it takes 5000 jobs to put-in-place $1 billion in one year. It could easily vary from 4000 to 6000. So an add of $100 billion+ in 2023 would need 500,000 new jobs. Adding $200 billion over two years would need 1,000,000 new jobs.

Construction Jobs vs Construction Volume

These plots updated to jobs report 10-6-23

Since Q1 2020, pre-pandemic high, spending increased 28%, but inflation was 33%, so real volume of work is down 5%. In that time jobs increased 5%. Jobs are way ahead of volume, but volume is backfilling in the void, especially in nonres bldgs.

This plot with baseline Jan 1, 2011 shows that jobs increase pretty consistently at about 3% to 4% per year. Except for the spike down in 2020, rate of growth (slope of the jobs line) is consistent for 13 years.

If we were to grow the labor force to meet the newly identified workload added from new starts, we would need to double the prior maximum rate of construction jobs growth. Normal construction jobs growth is about 250,000 jobs per year and maximum prior growth is about 400,000. The workload discussed above would require 500,000 new jobs/yr., back to back. That’s an expansion of the industry by 15%, in an industry that normally grows 3%/yr. This industry can’t grow that fast. (Which means we may all need to account for over-capacity growth as a potential reduction in future forecast. You can’t increase spending that fast if you can’t also expand the labor force and the suppliers to the industry that fast).

My first thoughts were, Jobs may not be able to increase fast enough to put-in-place the forecast spending. This impediment needs to be accounted for and could reduce overall construction spending forecast over the next two years. The most likely markets where a reduction might occur are Manufacturing, Highway and Public Utilities.

However this is what happened the past year. In the last 12 months, Aug’22 to Aug’23, Nonres Bldgs jobs are up 3.8%. Nonres Bldgs spending is up 21%, by far driven by Manufacturing, but after ~6% inflation, volume of nonres bldgs workload is up 15%. So, we have a 3.8% increase in jobs to accomodate a 15% increase in volume.

The last year has shown a huge increase in the volume of nonres bldgs work, without an equal increase in jobs. This shows the excess nonres bldgs jobs for the past three years is now absorbing new workload, (a 3.8% increase in jobs to accomodate a 15% increase in volume), without collapsing the labor force or canceling the volume. However, the ability to absorb work into the existing workforce cannot continue.

Non-building, over the next two years, could experience the same kind of growth spurt as Nonres Bldgs., a forecast increase in volume the next two years without an equal increase in jobs. Volume which was lower than jobs since 2021, is now increasing faster than jobs. Non-bldg volume is forecast up 6% to 8%/year the next 3 years. Jobs increase at an avg. 3.5%/year.

Residential volume has exceeded residential jobs all the way back to 2011. The recent decline in volume brings the two even, if the jobs hold the pace.

SEE more discussion on Volume and Jobs

here 2023 Construction Volume Growth

here 2023 Midyear Jobs Outlook

and here Infrastructure Construction Expansion – Not So Fast

See also Midyear Construction Forecast Update 8-12-23

Inflation Sept 2023 5min Video

This is a voice over power point converted to MP4. It’s a huge file. Only 9 slides but almost 225meg, 50x more memory than the original 9 slides.

Present Cost-Future Cost vs Present Value-Future Worth

A reader asked an interesting question, one that does not often come up in construction analytics. The following is an example to explain the difference.

The question: Our firm engages in construction projects that must be fully funded from cradle to grave to secure approval. A portion of these projects is remediation that will occur 10 years from now. What would be the Present Value to fund a project needed to be performed 10 years from now based on a similar project that cost $1,000,000 three years ago?

There are really two parts to this question. 1) What is the construction cost of remediation 10 years from now? 2) What is the Present Value of money today needed to fund that construction cost ten years from now?

  1. is determine the construction cost in 10 years based on inflation rates and a known project cost.
  2. is What is the value of money. How much do I need today to fund the project 10 years from now.

For the sake of this example we must assume some rates. Assume construction cost inflation the last three years was a total 25% and long term average inflation is 4%.

Present Cost to Future Cost is solved by applying construction inflation. To estimate cost of a project 10 years from now, we can only rely on long term average inflation for the type of work being performed. Long term average inflation is not the same as the inflation we have experienced over the last three years. So first let’s inflate the project from three years ago at 25% to today’s construction cost.

$1,000,000 (three years ago) x (1+25%) = $1,250,000 = similar project cost today.

Now let’s use long term average inflation (4%) to determine the construction cost 10 years from now. Inflation (like interest) must be compounded. So total interest over 10 years is interest for one year raised to the 10th power.

$1,250,000 (today’s cost) x (1+4%)^10 = $1,250,000 x 1.48 = $1,850,000

We would never assume the long term inflation to be repetitive of what we’ve seen over the last three years, so we use what we know occurred over the last three years to get to today, then project forward at the long term average historical rate.

The remedial work 10 years from now is estimated to cost $1,850,000. That is the Future Worth (FW) of the construction work needed. What is the Present Value (PV) of money needed to fund that Future Worth (FW)? How much must be invested in an account today so that it will grow to provide the funds needed to perform the FW work?

The growth rate of money is not the same as the inflation rate of construction. For the sake of this example, we need to make some assumption here for the growth rate of money. Let’s assume 3%. If we were to invest money today it can grow at 3%/year for 10 years. The answer to how much is needed to invest today (PV) to provide the full sum needed to fund the future (FW) is entirely dependant on the interest rate that can be secured for the term of the investment. We need $1,850,000 ten years from now. Divide the FW by the compounded rate of interest or money growth to find PV.

$1,850,000 (FW) / (1+3%)^10 = $1,850,000 / 1.34 = $1,376,000 (PV)

A Present Value (PV) of $1,376,000 must be invested today at a rate of 3% growth to ensure enough funds are available 10 years from now to perform the remediation work, a (FW) of $1,850,000.

Job Openings – Behind the Headlines

Construction Job Openings – Behind the Headlines

Recent data indicates ~ 300k job openings. Let’s look at support. To support those openings, there must be an equivalent added volume of work.

As we entered 2020, construction spending (in current $) was at a (then) all-time high of $1.530 trillion(t). Let’s set that point in time as the base and track growth since. Construction spending peaked in March 2023 at $1.970t and is currently at about $1.950t.

Volume growth in constant $ (constant $ = spending minus inflation) fell from $1.530t to $1.350t in Oct’22, has since returned to $1.450t as of June. So real volume growth is up off the bottom, but is still $80t or 5% below 2020. It is forecast to fall $50t over the next 6 months and return to current level in mid-2024.

Jobs, as we entered 2020, stood at 7.600 million(m). Jobs rapidly fell to 6.500m but recovered most of that by Dec 2020. Jobs now stand at 7.970m, up 5% since Jan 2020.

So, let’s summarize the facts: Since Jan 2020, spending is now nearly equal, volume of work is down 5%, but jobs are up 5%. So, since Jan 2020, jobs have increased 10% in excess of volume of work to support those jobs.

By my calc, if we were to add 300k jobs, either today or over the next year, we would see jobs increase by another 4%. Jobs growth since Jan’20 would exceed volume growth by nearly 14%. You might argue that 300k openings are there to fill the void of jobs supporting the current workload, but jobs growth already exceeds volume growth by 10% in the last 3 years.

Anyone want to try to explain how job openings of 300k is supported by the data?

Note 1: Job openings as of July are closer to 400,000

Note 2: plots shows baseline back to 2020 and 2001. Baseline 2001 situation becomes worse. See prior post https://edzarenski.com/2023/08/05/midyear-23-jobs-outlook/ for plots to baeline 2011 and 2020.

Midyear ’23 Jobs Outlook

Construction JOBS continue to creep higher, even when volume is falling. From Apr’22 to Oct’22 jobs increased 1.5% but volume of work dropped 10%. Jobs and volume should track together as seen from 2011 to 2018. Since Oct’22, jobs are up only 2% while volume up 7%. Volume is catching up.

Jobs have been increasing at 3%/year, or approx 200k to 300k jobs per year. In Feb 2020 there were 7.6 million construction jobs. Now there is almost 8.0 million. The average for 2020 dropped 3% or 170k jobs. But we regained jobs at 2.5% growth in 2021, 4.2% in 2022 and so far over 2% in 2023. Now this is interesting, because we did not see an increase in average volume in 2021, 2022 or 2023. In total, jobs are up 4.8% since Feb 2020, while volume of work is down 4.7%.

Construction Jobs have been on an even rate of growth approx. 2.5% to 3% per year, even when volume is falling. Spending has been on a bumpy climb, but keeps climbing. Without inflation real volume of work overall since 2020 has not increased at the same rate as jobs.

Current July Jobs are up 1.5% since Dec.’22, up 3% vs the average for 2022. July will be pretty close to the average for 2023. As construction inflation slowed down (has been slowing since mid-2022), volume gained ground on jobs over the last 9 mo., but jobs since Jan 2020 are still 10% higher than volume.

Here’s a look at total jobs just since 2020

Why do jobs sometimes/often grow faster than volume to support those jobs? Some possibilities:

When inflation is unusually strong, business planners may misjudge growth. Planning jobs growth on inflated revenues that net much lower than expected volume may lead to misjudging jobs growth. Result is jobs growth faster then volume.

When volume is decreasing, firms may be reluctant to (or smart not to) let go jobs. See the period on the above plot from Mar 2022 thru Oct 2022. Vol dropped 10%, Jobs increased 2%. So, the calculation shows a big excess in jobs for that period, because volume growth doesn’t support it. Within the next six months, volume increased 7%, making up half the difference.

Here’s jobs vs vol in each sector.

Notice how Rsdn jobs barely declined in 2020, but Rsdn volume increased 10%. Did that set off cries of jobs shortage in Rsdn? Not so in Nonres.

In Nonres Bldgs, volume by 2021 had fallen below growth in construction jobs. The deficit reached its worst in 2022 but in the last 9 months volume growth far faster than jobs growth has evened the balance.

Nonbuilding construction volume fell to a deeper deficit than Nonres Bldgs. But we can see the gap closing as volume increases faster than jobs.

These above three sector plots go back to base 2019, showing how much percent change there has been since 2019. For a longer term look, here below is a plot of Nonresidential Buildings back to 2011. On this plot we can see jobs growth, when compared to 2011, for Nonres Bldgs, is above volume growth since 2017. The low point of volume was in 2021. 2022-2023 has posted the most rapid growth in many years. This closes the gap between Nonres jobs and volume, very helpful to the productivity outlook.

When splitting out jobs by sector we must always remember that some Nonres bldgs jobs actually work on constructing residential buildings (for ex., steel and concrete on a multifamily hirise) but remain counted as nonres jobs. Also, some undocumented workers may not be counted at all in residential jobs. That skews the data plots. But you can see that it would reduce the jobs in Nonres and increase the jobs in residential, improving both plots.

Construction spending data is indicating a slight dip in volume growth over the 2nd half 2023, but then leading into much stronger growth in 2024 in all sectors. Volume by Feb’24 is back to today’s level after falling 5%. I don’t expect jobs to decline with the drop in volume. Maybe slow down. I think at worst jobs hold steady for a few months before resuming 2.5%-3% annual growth later this year.

When jobs continue to increase while volume is dropping, that wrecks productivity. But sometimes volume increases rapidly while jobs grow steady at a 3% rate. Look at the period Oct’22 thru Jan’23. Jobs increased 2%, but volume quickly jumped 6%.

The number of jobs required to put-in-place $1 billion of construction in one year, as plotted below, about 5000 for residential, is the inverse of the plot above, the annual amount of $ put-in-place per job, about $200,000 for residential.

Follow Construction Analytics on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Follow me on Twitter @EdZarenski

CONTACT ME by EMAIL