Tariff actions are not yet reflected in Feb PPI Inputs or PPI Final Demand index. Still early. Also remember, PPI does not include imports or tariffs on imports. When we do see movement in the PPI, it reflects domestic pricing decisions following on tariffs.
Lutnick: “Foreign goods may become a little more expensive, but domestic goods do not.” FALSE see next par.
PPI Excludes Imports/Tariffs. The 2018 steel tariffs of +25% applied on imported steel. However the 2018 PPI data shows that the cost of ALL DOMESTIC steel mill products (of all types) produced in the US increased 18% in 2018, after the steel tariffs were imposed.
If tariffs, for example, affect only 10% or 20% of products used in the industry, then the PPI shows us the domestic producers reaction to tariffs, which gets applied to the other 80% to 90% of product. For instance all steel is not imported, so not all steel will experience a tariff. The point here is that tariffs impact pricing decisions on all domestically produced products, not just the imported products. Consumers pay the price.
Impacts on Construction Inflation and Spending (guesstimates).
2021 inflation was 8%-14%. 2022 it was 12%-17%. Could 2025 repeat 2022? Yes. Will it? ??? I guess it hits 6%-10%.
I’m guessing some projects contributing to 2025 spending will be canceled/postponed. So maybe spending drops 5% from here, to zero growth. Construction spending annual growth is normally in the range 4% to 10%. 2025 and 2026 were both forecast at 5% to 7%. No doubt some projects will be canceled or mothballed. So the next 3 yrs spending gets reduced, and cost gets increased.
I’m beginning to think one of the first issues we have to deal with is supply shortages. All types of imported products are not going to be available, and there aren’t enough domestic products to replace them. This will add delays and cost to building projects.
Yeears ago, when I was a construction cost estimator, a major client would run numbers on a proposed new building project. If it couldn’t balance a ROI in 7 yrs, project would not move forward. As cost to build increases, it becomes harder to hit ROI. This supports that some projects may be canceled or postponed.
- Construction – What to Watch
- Cost to build going up
- Cost to finance is up
- Product availability in question
- Product delivery schedule delays
- Margins pressured
- Small/Midsize firms squeezed
- Labor let go/disappearing
- Projects in planning, delayed
- Project ROI not met
- Projects planned, canceled
Virginia has the largest concentration of Data Centers in the U.S. Virginia is projecting energy shortages due to the extreme demand DCs put on power grids. If you don’t build out the energy grid, the data centers put too great a demand on the current grid. “There are six states in the United States where data centres already consume over 10% of the electricity supply, with Virginia leading at 25%.” https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-ai/understanding-the-energy-ai-nexus
In the Q1 pre-tariff outlook, Data Center spending (SAAR), began the year 16% above the avg of 2024, is steadily climbing at 1.5% to 2%/mo., and sometimes more, is now up 22% vs avg 2024. By midyear the rate of spending will be up 28%. Data Center spending increased 45% in 2023 and 56% in 2024. Forecast for 2025 +37%. Obviously, this could get reduced if/when some projects get canceled.
The New Albany (Ohio) project, projected worth $1bil, is one of the two announced DC projects that have been halted https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/licking-county/microsoft-pulls-out-of-licking-county-projects/
What if: A 10%/yr reduction in forecast new Data Center starts in 2025 and 2026 would result in reduced Data Center construction spending by -3% in 2025, -7% in 2026, -7% in 2027 and -3% in 2028.
What if: A 10%/yr reduction in forecast new Data Center starts in 2025 and 2026, combined with a 10% cancelation of 2024 starts, would result in reduced Data Center construction spending by -8% in 2025, -10% in 2026, -8% in 2027 and -3% in 2028. A 10% drop in Data Center spending is $4bil/yr.
It is not clear if the two halted projects mentioned in the article above were already committed construction starts or future proposed starts.
The Fed Chair just said what every credible economist, every economics textbook, and every empirical study shows: Tariffs reduce output and raise prices. – Justin Wolfers, Econ professor at Michigan, Senior fellow, Brookings and PIIE.
Let’s not forget what initiated growth in new manufacturing facilities. New manufacturing building contract starts over the last 3yrs is just over $600bil. Normal starts without government investment would be about $300bil over 3yrs. About $100bil of spending growth over the 3 years is inflation, leaving the remainder of about $200bil in spending growth attributed to government investment. All that began, and most of it got spent, under the previous administration. https://www.forbes.com/sites/courtneyfingar/2024/12/12/manufacturing-jobs-boom-arrives-too-late-for-biden-to-benefit/
Whenever we get an unusually large increase in new construction starts and spending, the tapering off of those projects leads to a decline on the tail end. Mnfg new starts peaked in 2022-2023. We are entering the period of the manufacturing construction spending taper. Mnfg spending has fallen slightly in 4 of the last 5 months. The forecast for 2025 is down -10%.
Microsoft has announced a pullback in spending on new Data Centers. Reduced demand negates need for new facilities, kills expansion plans, lowers new construction forecast, decreases jobs growth in construction. Mothball if partially built factory, not only expensive for owner, but also negative impact to contractor’s forecast revenues.
Whenever there’s a devastating natural disaster, causing destruction to homes, property and infrastructure, the supply of contractors, laborers and materials stays the same while demand skyrockets from victims trying to rebuild. Contractors generally pick more profitable projects over less lucrative ones.
In the Construction Analytics Outlook Feb 2025 report I said, “Don’t be surprised if 2025 construction jobs growth slows a bit. Jobs are slightly ahead of volume growth, particularly in the Non-building Infrastructure sector.”
Construction gained 19k (+0.2%) jobs in Feb, BUT total hours worked declined 0.3%. Total jobs have increased but Hrs worked has gone down the last 5 months. We’ve posted minor jobs gains in both Jan and Feb, and yet unemployment has gone up from 5.2% in Dec to 7.2% in Feb.
The March jobs report shows only minor gains in the # of jobs. We’ve added only 24,000 new jobs in the 1st quarter, the slowest 1st qtr jobs growth in 13 years (except for 2020, Covid). But hours worked in March increased by 1.5%. That acts on the entire 8.3 million workforce and is equivalent to adding 128,000 more jobs.
The jobs numbers reported April 4th cover the period from Feb15-Mar15. There are not yet any impacts from tariffs reflected in the jobs numbers.
We may see the term “force majeure” come up a lot in the near future. And if construction contracts don’t have a force majeure clause, there may be a lot of contractors in trouble.
My guess is if the people of Greenland take a vote to Join the United States, it would be 99-1 No. Of course, they would say “No, thank you.” As they so eloquently put it, “We’re not assholes.”
Construction Analytics 